Honest comparison
Bothy vs. GrantHub
Last updated May 21, 2026 · Reading time ~7 minutes
The deadline has passed
GrantHub was discontinued on January 31, 2026. Since then, the platform has been unavailable. If your team migrated before then, you're probably comparing options now. If you didn't, you're working from whatever CSV export you took — or rebuilding from notes. Either way, we can help.
Foundant concentrated on the grantmaker (funder) side of the market. The grantseeker side — that was you — got retired. Foundant's announcement
The TL;DR
- You don't need to spend more. Bothy Solo at $99/mo is at or below typical GrantHub pricing.
- You can get features GrantHub didn't have — stewardship tasks, funder profile aggregation, post-award reporting hub, lapsed-funder alerts.
- You give up tenure.GrantHub had 10 years and a thousand+ customer logos. We're newer. That's real.
- You don't get a 10,000-funder database.Neither did GrantHub. If you're looking for that, see our notes on Instrumentl below.
Feature-by-feature
Best-effort comparison based on GrantHub's public documentation and our customers' reports. = does it well, = does it with caveats, = doesn't do it.
Status
GHSunset Jan 31, 2026BothyActive, accepting customersStarting price
GH$59 – $129/mo (historical)Bothy$99/mo (Solo)Grant pipeline tracking
GHYesBothyYes — scoring + drag-drop stagesFunder profile (aggregated view per funder)
GHLimitedBothyYes — full per-funder historyStewardship task management
GHNoBothyYes — including AI stewardship plans you can save as tasksFunder contact log (past touches)
GHWorkarounds via notesBothyYes — first-class featureReporting tracker (post-award)
GHLimited — date + file + statusBothyReporting workspace — timeline + 24-component checklist + role ownersBoard-ready report
GHBasic reporting + exportsBothyOne-click board packet — health tiles, pipeline by stage, deadlines, editable commentary, print-readyAward-letter requirements ingestion
GHNo — award PDF sits in storageBothyYes — guided structured form generates timeline + checklistRenewal cultivation arc on submission
GHNoBothyYes — thank-you, site visit, mid-cycle touch, renewal LOI auto-createdEmail deadline reminders
GHYesBothyYes — 7/3/1 day cadenceCalendar (ICS) export
GHYesBothyYes — deadlines + tasks + reportsBuilt-in funder database
GHNoBothyNo — curated research insteadCurated opportunity research at signup
GHNot offeredBothyYes (Pro + Premium tiers)AI-drafted reports
GHNoBothyComing Q3 2026 (Premium tier)Mobile-friendly
GHLimitedBothyYes — pilot dashboards mobile-testedNumber of customers using it
GH~1,000+ (historical)Bothy42 pilot orgs · early SaaS accessYears in market
GH10+ yearsBothyPilot 2026Migration support from GrantHub
GHN/ABothyFree data migration + setup fee waivedMulti-user with live presence
GHMulti-user, no live presenceBothyMulti-user + real-time presence + per-action audit trailSign-in
GHEmail + passwordBothyGoogle sign-in + magic-link fallback (no passwords to rotate)Role-based access (owner/admin/editor/viewer)
GHLimitedBothyYes — last-owner protection enforced at the databaseSoft-delete + one-click restore
GHNo — deleted is deletedBothyYes — restore any grant/task/report from the Activity tabPublic status page
GHNoBothyYes — bothy.so/status (live DB probe)
Where GrantHub was honestly better
Tenure matters. GrantHub built up institutional knowledge in the segment over 10+ years, and a lot of nonprofits picked up workflows specifically shaped to its UI. If you have a team that knows GrantHub cold, the transition cost is real — even if the destination is better.
We're not going to pretend otherwise. Our pitch is: we'll absorb the migration cost (free data migration + setup fee waived), and we'll be patient while your team finds their new flow.
Where we think we're honestly better
GrantHub treated grant tracking as a pipeline problem. We treat it as a relationship problem. A grant is a moment in a multi-year relationship — and the workflow we built reflects that:
- · Funder profile view aggregates every grant, task, report, and contact-log entry against one funder
- · Stewardship tasks live alongside the grant, not in a separate tool
- · Lapsed-funder alerts flag funded relationships you haven't touched in 90+ days
- · Funder contact log records every email, call, meeting — past + future in one place
These are the features GrantHub users most often built workarounds for. We built them in.
If you also looked at Instrumentl
Instrumentl is what comes up most often in GrantHub-replacement searches. The short read:
- · It has a much bigger funder discovery database (genuinely useful)
- · It starts at $349/month — a 230% increase from GrantHub baseline
- · It's built for larger orgs with dedicated grants managers and 20+ applications a year
If you have a dedicated grants manager and budget to match, Instrumentl is a real option. If you're a small-to-mid org running a leaner operation, we're built for you.
Full side-by-side: Bothy vs. Instrumentl →
Vendor-level market analysis: our research page or directly to The Grant Management Software Market in 2026 .
Our offer for GrantHub orphans
Show us a GrantHub invoice — any year.
- Free data migration from a GrantHub CSV export
- $1,500 Pro setup fee waived
- First 60 days free on Solo or Pro
- Match your prior GrantHub subscription length for the annual discount
We're still onboarding orphaned GrantHub customers months after the sunset. Drop your email and the data you have — we'll come back with a concrete plan.
Read more before deciding
- The 4-week GrantHub migration plan →
Concrete week-by-week plan: export data, evaluate options, clean data, onboard team.
- The principles we hold ourselves to →
The five working principles we use to design the product, with how to hold us to them.
- The full grant management software market analysis →
Independent vendor analysis with verified 2026 pricing for every major option.